Judgment affirmed.
It is undisputed that defendant made no conscious refusal to the taking of blood; in fact there is proof that he consented while conscious. Questions of fact for the jury included the identity of the driver of the automobile and the time, making and legality of the arrest prior to the withdrawal of blood.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.