WHITNEY v. AKERS

Civ. No. 65-215.

247 F.Supp. 763 (1965)

Genevieve WHITNEY, Plaintiff, v. William Frederick AKERS and Gibson Charles Akers, Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma.

November 22, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don W. Davis, Dallas, Tex., Charles E. Malson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff.

John M. McPherren, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants.


DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and for a New Trial, and the response of defendant thereto, together with briefs submitted by both sides, the Court finds that both motions should be denied.

With reference to the Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, it is not possible under the evidence to grant same as the evidence was conflicting and in dispute on the issues of liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases