GETZ v. ROBINSON

Civ. A. Nos. 62-422, 62-894.

232 F.Supp. 763 (1964)

Richard E. GETZ, Plaintiff, v. Albert ROBINSON, Defendant. Mario RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. P-W Corporation ARMOURED CARRIER CORPORATION, Defendants, v. Albert ROBINSON and Valley Sales Corporation, Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

June 4, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel R. Sciullo, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff Richard E. Getz.

Weis & Weis, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant and third-party defendant Albert Robinson.

McArdle, Harrington & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff Mario Ramos.

William J. Lancaster, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant Armoured Carrier Corp.


MARSH, District Judge.

Following the verdict1 of the jury on liability in the above entitled actions and the judgments entered thereon, the plaintiffs, Mario Ramos and Richard E. Getz, moved for a new trial. The motions will be denied.2

Grounds assigned by both movants for a new trial were that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that the actions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases