A careful examination of the record in this case and consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties convince us that the findings and decision of the district court were correct. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed on the basis of that court's opinion reported in
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
THOMAS v. YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE COMPANY,
No. 7286.
327 F.2d 667 (1964)
C. C. THOMAS, Appellant, v. YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE COMPANY, Webb & Knapp, Inc., Murph's Express, a partnership, E. T. Cressman, Peter B. Taylor, Rice's Food Store, and Dawson, Nagel, Sherman and Howard, Appellees. In the Matter of C. C. THOMAS, Alleged Bankrupt.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 17, 1964.
February 17, 1964.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Allen A. Thoreen and Clayton H. Morrison, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Richard H. Shaw, of Modesitt & Shaw, Denver, Colo., for appellee Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.
Gerald M. Quiat, of Quiat, Seeman, Quiat & Woods, Denver, Colo., for appellee Webb & Knapp, Inc.
No appearances for other appellees.
Before BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges, and KERR, District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
