Per Curiam.
The motion was made on the day before the interlocutory decree of divorce granted plaintiff would have become final as of course. The parties having lived together for about two prior years were married in Connecticut on August 3, 1945 following the grant of the foreign decree. Defendant's explanation for the default is that the wife's prior divorce was a nullity because of an alleged "mail-order" characteristic of which he was unaware. It is undisputed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
