GOLDSTEIN v. DOFT


236 F.Supp. 730 (1964)

Edward GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. Max DOFT, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 29, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob Rassner, New York City, for plaintiff.

Kurzman & Frank, New York City, for defendant; Samuel B. Seidel, New York City, of counsel.


WEINFELD, District Judge.

Upon assignment of this case for trial, the defendant renewed his motion for judgment based upon the defense of res judicata, and plaintiff likewise renewed his motion to strike the defense. Judge Cashin, in denying the defendant's motion, granted his alternative one to require plaintiff to set forth a more definite statement of his claim in order to permit adequate consideration of the res judicata plea.1 Following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases