1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 236 F.Supp.
  5. 236 F.Supp. 713 (1964)
 

BRONNER v. GOLDMAN

Civ. A. No. 61-374.

236 F.Supp. 713 (1964)

Manja T. BRONNER v. Arthur I. GOLDMAN, Nathan Brezner, Murray R. Fine, Edith R. Katz, Arnold Goodman and Kate Katz, Copartners under the name and style of Roberts & Co.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

December 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark M. Horblit, Samuel H. Kalish, and Peter R. Tritsch, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Charles R. Goldstein, Henry M. Leen and Thomas J. Carens, Boston, Mass., for defendants.

CAFFREY, District Judge.

This is a civil action brought by plaintiff against a group of individuals who are co-partners doing business as Roberts & Company. Jurisdiction is alleged to exist on the basis of 15 U.S.C.A. § 78aa. Plaintiff seeks rescission of a promissory note which she executed on December 14, 1959, payable to the order of Roberts & Company, in the amount of $184,242.34, money damages, and other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases