1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 229 Cal.App.2d
  5. 229 Cal.App.2d 696 (1964)
 

BURK v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR WHITTIER JUDICIAL DIST.

Docket No. 28033.

229 Cal.App.2d 696 (1964)

40 Cal. Rptr. 425

ROBERT BURK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE WHITTIER JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; CITY OF WHITTIER, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

September 15, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Von Esch, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

Thomas W. Bewley, City Attorney, Martin E. Whelan, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, and Bewley, Knoop, Lassleben & Whelan for Real Party in Interest.

BURKE, P.J.

Petitioner Burk was charged in respondent municipal court with a violation of section 4260.75, Whittier Municipal Code, and section 1200, Whittier Municipal Code, in that he "did willfully and unlawfully erect and maintain a sign for advertising and display purposes upon real property, zoned R-3, and located at 224 North Greenleaf Ave. in the City of Whittier which sign did contain the words `For Sale' and did refer to Bob Burke Reality [sic], which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases