Judgment affirmed.
While there was some confusion on sentence, the defendant and his counsel intentionally or unintentionally contributed to such confusion by knowingly making a misrepresentation as to the time to be served by the defendant. Under all the circumstances, there was no prejudice to any substantial right of the defendant.
Brennan and Rabin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to remand the defendant for rearraignment, with the following...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
