Judgment affirmed.
In our opinion, although it was error to admit into evidence defendant's hat and coat because their seizure was the result of a search which was not incidental to defendant's arrest, nevertheless the admission of such evidence did not affect defendant's substantial rights and may be disregarded (Code Crim. Pro., § 542). [For affirmance of judgment as to the codefendant, see People v. De Berry, 20...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
