ZINK v. ZINK

No. 40332.

390 P.2d 504 (1964)

John Smith ZINK, Plaintiff in Error, v. Ellen McKinney ZINK, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 3, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ed Parks, Farmer, Woolsey, Flippo & Bailey, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Fenelon Boesche, Richard B. McDermott, T. Hillas Eskridge, Tulsa, for defendant in error.


IRWIN, Justice.

This appeal and cross-appeal concern a judgment rendered in a divorce action. The plaintiff in error, husband, in his appeal, contends the amount of alimony, child support and attorney's fees awarded to the defendant in error, the wife, is excessive. On the other hand, the wife, in her cross-appeal, contends the amount awarded as and for division of jointly acquired property, alimony, child support and attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases