ARTISAN FLOORING v. SCHAPIRO

[No. 56, September Term, 1964.]

236 Md. 644 (1964)

205 A.2d 211

ARTISAN FLOORING, INC. v. SCHAPIRO, ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 4, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl A. Durkee, with whom were Wells, Durkee & Albert on the brief, for the appellant.

Marvin C. Wahl, with whom was Blanche G. Wahl on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.


PER CURIAM:

This case presents a narrow issue as to whether the trial court, sitting without a jury, was in error in finding that no contract had been made between the owner and a flooring contractor in a building operation. The appellees had entered into a written contract with a builder, Proutt, for the construction of a home. When nearly completed, the house burned, and the builder undertook to replace it, including the flooring, on terms similar to those in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases