1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 60 Cal.2d
  5. 60 Cal.2d 816 (1964)
 

SNAPP v. STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. CO.

Docket No. L.A. 27283.

60 Cal.2d 816 (1964)

388 P.2d 884

36 Cal. Rptr. 612

KENNETH M. SNAPP et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

February 6, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Bentley for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Bert W. Levit, David C. Bogert and Long & Levit for Defendant and Respondent.

PETERS, J.

The sole point involved on this appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, after the judgment was reversed with directions, and, pursuant to such directions, a revised judgment was entered, interest should start to run from the date of the original judgment or from the date of the revised judgment. We have concluded that under the rules announced in Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. Palermo, 55 Cal.2d 439

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases