1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.2d
  4. 32 Ill.2d
  5. 32 Ill.2d 55 (1964)
 

SKOLNICK v. MARTIN

No. 38597.

32 Ill.2d 55 (1964)

203 N.E.2d 428

SHERMAN H. SKOLNICK, Appellee, v. CHARLES T. MARTIN et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Rehearing denied January 19, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

BELL, BOYD, LLOYD, HADDAD & BURNS, CHARLES T. MARTIN and J. WILLIAM HAYTON, all of Chicago, for appellant Charles T. Martin.

FRANK GLAZER, of Chicago, for appellants Arthur Lilly and Charles R. Perrigo.

SHERMAN H. SKOLNICK, of Chicago, pro se.

Appellate Ct. reversed; superior ct, affirmed.

Mr. JUSTICE DAILY delivered the opinion of the court:

We have granted leave to appeal in this case to consider widely divergent constructions of section 48(1) (c) of our Civil Practice Act arrived at by the Appellate Court for the First District in F & F Laboratories, Inc. v. Chocolate Spraying Co. 6 Ill.App.2d 299, and in Skolnick v. Martin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases