1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 228 Cal.App.2d
  5. 228 Cal.App.2d 622 (1964)
 

PEOPLE v. LAUDERDALE

Docket No. 109.

228 Cal.App.2d 622 (1964)

39 Cal. Rptr. 688

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HARVEY LAUDERDALE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

July 22, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John N. Cooley, under appointment by the District Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

CONLEY, P.J.

The petitioner, Harvey Lauderdale, appeals from an order denying a writ of error coram nobis. [1] There are at least three good grounds for affirmance:

1) The petition was filed some eight years after the conviction of the petitioner for violation of section 470 of the Penal Code without any showing of a reason for such delay. (People v. Adamson, 34 Cal.2d 320, 328-329 [

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases