1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 233 F.Supp.
  5. 233 F.Supp. 615 (1964)
 

SINCOCK v. ROMAN

Civ. A. No. 2470.

233 F.Supp. 615 (1964)

Richard SINCOCK et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mabel V. ROMAN et al., Defendants.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

As Amended October 16, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent A. Theisen and Victor F. Battaglia, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiffs.

David P. Buckson, Atty. Gen., Daniel L. Herrmann, Frank O'Donnell, Wilmington, Del., Max Terry, and James H. Hughes, III, Dover, Del., for defendants.

H. Edward Maull, Georgetown, Del., and Bruce M. Stargatt, Wilmington, Del., amici curiæ.

Before BIGGS, Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT and LAYTON, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The history of this litigation is set out in the decisions cited in the footnote.1 Following the affirmation of our judgments by the Supreme Court in Roman v. Sincock, 377 U.S. 695, 84 S.Ct. 1449, 12 L.Ed.2d 620 (1964), the General Assembly of Delaware enacted two statutes, respectively on July 6 and July 8, 1964, to reapportion Delaware in respect to the election of members of the General Assembly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases