1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 337 F.2d
  5. 337 F.2d 510 (1964)
 

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. KING

No. 17607.

337 F.2d 510 (1964)

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. Alfred KING, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied November 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. C. Walsh, of Pryor, Riley, Jones & Walsh, Burlington, Iowa, and K. A. Aspelmeier, of Pryor, Riley, Jones & Walsh, Burlington, Iowa, made argument for appellant and filed brief with J. C. Pryor and J. C. Riley, Burlington, Iowa, of the same firm.

Robert E. Dreher, and Kenneth H. Haynie, Des Moines, Iowa, made argument for appellee and filed brief.

Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIES, District Judge.

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company from a judgment for $118,593.10 entered against it upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Alfred King in an action for damages predicated upon negligence arising out of a collision between a car operated by plaintiff and defendant's train at a country railroad crossing southeast of Harvey, Iowa, about 1:15 p. m. on September 30, 1960. The collision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases