WEINSTEIN v. SUSSKIND

No. 63-513.

162 So.2d 683 (1964)

Rose WEINSTEIN, Appellant, v. Carl SUSSKIND and Martha Susskind, also known as Martha Susskind, as Guardian of Harry B. Susskind and Willa Sue Susskind, Harry Susskind, also known as Harry B. Susskind, and Willa Sue Susskind, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 14, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simon Englander, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Myers, Heiman & Kaplan, Eugene C. Heiman and Philip Bloom, Miami, for appellees.

Before HORTON, TILLMAN PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.


TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant was one of the defendants in an action in the circuit court to collect on three promissory notes totalling $100,000. She appeals a summary final judgment against her for $99,900 principal, $4,400 attorney's fees and costs of $32.00.

Rose Weinstein, the appellant, was one of the endorsers with her husband upon the notes with which we are concerned. A corporation known as Benel, Inc. was the maker of the notes. Rose Weinstein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases