HUHTA v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS


151 Conn. 694 (1964)

VIENO L. HUHTA ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 23, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julius B. Kuriansky, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Maurice J. Buckley, for the appellees (defendant Coughlin et al.).

Theodore Godlin, for the appellee (defendant board).

KING, C. J., MURPHY, ALCORN, COMLEY and HOUSE, JS.


HOUSE, J.

The four individual defendants were the common owners of a parcel of land in Stamford adjacent to the Merritt Parkway. The lot contained about .96 of an acre in a designed business zone and about 1.37 acres in a residential zone. Pursuant to § 19 (A) (2) (d) of the Stamford zoning regulations,1 they made application to the zoning board of appeals "that the use permitted in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases