PERRY v. TAURO


21 A.D.2d 804 (1964)

Gillick W. Perry, an Infant, by Lillian O'Grady, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Marano Tauro, Defendant, and Corino Tauro, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 10, 1964


Order affirmed, without costs.

In denying this motion to settle an abridged typewritten transcript of the stenographic trial minutes, the trial court did so on the ground that, in the absence of the parties' consent, the court was without power under rule 5525 of the CPLR to settle any transcript which failed to include the "entire transcript" of the stenographic minutes of the trial. We are in accord with such interpretation of the rule. The settlement of the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases