DOMINY v. CECIL

No. 36752.

63 Wn.2d 760 (1964)

388 P.2d 917

CHARLES E. DOMINY, Appellant, v. EDWARD CECIL, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

February 6, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Casey & Pruzan, by John F. Kovarik, for appellant.

Torbenson, Thatcher & Stevenson and Joseph R. Burns, for respondent.


DONWORTH, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant an injunction restraining respondent, a former partner, from soliciting or conducting business in certain territory and dismissing the action.

May 1, 1960, the parties, by written agreement, created a partnership known as North County Merchant Patrol. September 1, 1960, they executed another instrument designated as "Partnership Termination Agreement" whereby they dissolved the partnership. Included...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases