1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 63 Wn.2d
  5. 63 Wn.2d 756 (1964)
 

"U" DIST. BLDG. CORP. v. O'CONNELL

No. 36774.

63 Wn.2d 756 (1964)

388 P.2d 922

"U" DISTRICT BUILDING CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. JOHN O'CONNELL, as Attorney General, et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 6, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar A. Zabel and David Skellenger, for appellants.

The Attorney General, Arthur Mickey and Paul D. Solomon, Assistants, for respondents.

ROSELLINI, J.

This proceeding was brought by the appellants seeking a declaratory judgment (under the authority of RCW 7.24.020) that chapter 49, Laws of 1933, Ex. Ses., as amended by Laws of 1951, chapter 120, § 1 (RCW 66.44.190) is unconstitutional. Their action was dismissed on motion of the respondents.

RCW 66.44.190 prohibits sales of intoxicating liquors on the grounds of the University of Washington and within a

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases