1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 375 U.S.
  5. 375 U.S. 440 (1964)
 

REISMAN v. CAPLIN

No. 119.

375 U.S. 440 (1964)

REISMAN ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS TRAMMELL, RAND & NATHAN, v. CAPLIN ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 20, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren E. Magee argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Hans A. Nathan.

Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for respondent Caplin were Solicitor General Cox, Stephen J. Pollak, Joseph M. Howard and Norman Sepenuk.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioners, attorneys for taxpayers Martin J. and Allyn Bromley, seek declaratory and injunctive relief against respondent Caplin, the Internal Revenue Commissioner, and the accounting firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., which at the instance of petitioners has been working on the financial records of the Bromleys. Petitioners claim as null and void summonses issued by the Commissioner,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases