1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 227 Cal.App.2d
  5. 227 Cal.App.2d 587 (1964)
 

SHOEMAKE v. F.H. WOODRUFF & SON, INC.

Docket No. 338.

227 Cal.App.2d 587 (1964)

38 Cal. Rptr. 817

A.C. SHOEMAKE et al., Cross-complainants and Respondents, v. F.H. WOODRUFF & SON, INC., Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

June 1, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gant & Gant and Wilbur S. Legg for Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Zeff, Halley & Price and William Zeff for Cross-complainants and Respondents.

CONLEY, P.J.

This is the second appeal in this litigation. (Hayman v. Shoemake, 203 Cal.App.2d 140 [21 Cal.Rptr. 519].) The plaintiffs, Louis Hayman and George Covert, who are not parties to the appeal, bought from the defendants and cross-complainants a field of onions and thereafter sued them for damages because of the breach of their express warranty that the onions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases