PHILLIPS v. PARNELL

No. 175.

134 S.E.2d 676 (1964)

261 N.C. 410

Billy Ray PHILLIPS v. Joe PARNELL.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Teague, Johnson & Patterson, by Robert M. Clay, Raleigh, for defendant Joe Parnell, appellee.

Dupree, Weaver, Horton & Cockman, by F. T. Dupree, Jr., Jerry S. Alvis, Raleigh, for additional defendants, Ottis Davis Blue and William Elliott, appellants.

No counsel contra.


PER CURIAM.

The pleadings of all parties were direct and concise. They presented clear-cut issues of fact. The evidence consisted of the testimony of the plaintiff, the original defendant, and the investigating officer. The controversy in this Court, however, involves only the fourth issue—the original defendant's claim for contribution against the additional defendants. The evidence was ample to sustain the jury's findings.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases