ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES

Civ. A. No. 7826.

225 F.Supp. 584 (1964)

The ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company and The Colorado and Southern Railway Company, Intervening Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants, The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company et al., Intervening Defendants, Chicago and North Western Railway Company et al., Intervening Defendants.

United States District Court D. Colorado.

January 16, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant, Shafroth, Toll & McHendrie, Douglas McHendrie, Denver, Colo., Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, Douglas F. Smith, Howard J. Trienens, George L. Saunders, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs, and S. R. Brittingham, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Frank S. Farrell, St. Paul, Minn., Ernest Porter, Denver, Colo., Howard E. Roos, Portland, Or., and L. E. Torinus, Jr., St. Paul, Minn., of counsel.

J. C. Street, Denver, Colo., for Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. and Colorado and Southern Railway Company, intervening plaintiffs.

Lee Loevinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., John H. D. Wigger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., for D. of Colo., Denver, Colo., for the United States.

Robert W. Ginnane, Gen. Counsel, Stanton P. Sender, Atty., Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Holland & Hart, Josiah G. Holland, James T. Moran, Denver, Colo., for intervening defendants Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co. and others.

E. R. Leigh, Louisville, Ky., for intervening defendant Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co.

Kenneth H. Lundmark, New York City and Joseph F. Eshelman, Philadelphia, Pa., for said intervening defendants other than Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. Andrew C. Armstrong, Baltimore, Md., Kemper A. Dobbins, Cleveland, Ohio, John W. Hanifin, Richmond, Va., Edward A. Kaier, Philadelphia, Pa., M. C. Smith, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, and Donald M. Tolmie, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

William V. Hodges, Jr., Denver, Colo., Nye F. Morehouse, Chicago, Ill., and Bryce L. Hamilton, Chicago, Ill., for Chicago and North Western Ry. Co. and others, intervening Western Trunk Line defendants. Martin L. Cassell, Chicago, Ill., John E. McCullough, Robert H. Stahlheber, St. Louis, Mo., Hodges, Silverstein, Hodges & Harrington, Denver, Colo., and Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Before SETH, Circuit Judge, and ARRAJ and DOYLE, District Judges.


DOYLE, District Judge.

This is an action to enjoin, set aside, annul and suspend an order entered by the Interstate Commerce Commission in administrative proceedings identified as I.C.C. Docket No. 31627. The report in the administrative proceedings, decided May 7, 1962, is found at 316 I.C.C. 351.

The underlying controversy giving rise to these proceedings was a dispute, initiated by the eastern railroads, as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases