1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 230 Cal.App.2d
  5. 230 Cal.App.2d 568 (1964)
 

OTASH v. BUREAU OF PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS AND ADJUSTERS

Docket No. 28308.

230 Cal.App.2d 568 (1964)

41 Cal. Rptr. 263

FRED OTASH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BUREAU OF PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS AND ADJUSTERS, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

November 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Mosk and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorneys General, and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Appellant.

Jerome Weber and Bernard Mattison for Plaintiff and Respondent.

JEFFERSON, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate against appellant Bureau of Private Investigators and Adjusters, Department of Professional and Vocational Standards (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Bureau). The proceedings in the court below were instituted by respondent Otash who filed a petition for a writ of mandate seeking to set aside a decision of the Bureau revoking his license as a private investigator.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases