1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 134 S.E.2d
  5. 134 S.E.2d 662 (1964)
 

PEARCE v. HEWITT

No. 182.

134 S.E.2d 662 (1964)

261 N.C. 408

James PEARCE and wife, Isabelle T. Pearce v. O. Calloway HEWITT and Rachel Hewitt, his guardian, and Rachel Hewitt, individually.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl Whitted, Jr., Goldsboro, and Samuel Smith Mitchell, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant.

Venters & Dotson, Jacksonville, for defendant appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A review of the evidence adduced in the trial below, including the documentary evidence, leads us to the conclusion that the plaintiffs did not make out a valid claim to the premises involved, and now owned by the defendant Rachel Hewitt, or any interest therein, Ricks v. Batchelor, 225 N.C. 8, 33 S.E.2d 68; Glass v. Lynchburg Shoe Co., 212 N.C. 70, 192 S.E. 899; Waters v. Crabtree, 105 N.C. 394, 11 S.E. 240; G.S. § 47-18; neither was the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases