Order, entered on December 3, 1962, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.
The debt sued upon arose out of the settlement of an earlier suit between the parties. No facts are pleaded to show that any restraint on trade, which may result from the alleged conspiracy between dealers, was either promoted or fostered by the creation of the obligation upon which this suit was brought. Absent such facts the pleading does not constitute a defense.<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
