KEEFAUVER v. RICHARDSON

[No. 183, September Term, 1963.]

233 Md. 545 (1964)

197 A.2d 438

KEEFAUVER ET UX. v. RICHARDSON ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 18, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Bourne and David A. McNamee, with whom were W. Carroll Beatty and Beatty & McNamee on the brief, for the appellants.

Richard B. Bland, with whom were Clifton M. Eisele, Jr., and Welsh & Lancaster on the brief, for the appellee, James E. Richardson, Jr.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.


MARBURY J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

To be resolved on this appeal is the question of which of the parties has superior claim to lots numbered 33 to 36 inclusive, in the subdivision known as "Shanabrooke's Resubdivision of Central Heights", College Park, Maryland. The appellants, J. Earl Keefauver and his wife, claim the property by virtue of tax titles and adverse possession, while the appellee James E. Richardson, Jr. presents his claim under a right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases