MATTER OF GOLDSMITH v. GABEL


42 Misc.2d 732 (1964)

In the Matter of George Goldsmith, Petitioner, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

March 20, 1964


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bendes Stark & Amron (Howard C. Amron of counsel), for petitioner. Beatrice Shainswit and Florence R. Zimmerman for respondent. Richard L. Levenson and Nancy Le Blanc for Metropolitan Council on Housing, amicus curiæ. David G. Lubell for National Lawyers Guild, New York Chapter, amicus curi&aelig.


ABRAHAM N. GELLER, J.

In this article 78 proceeding petitioner attacks the validity of the Rent Administrator's promulgation of a regulation (§ 54, subd. e) governing the procedures with respect to relocation or stipend payments to be followed in cases wherein landlords meet the requirements of other sections of the regulations for removal or eviction.

Petitioner contends that, under that regulation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases