STATE v. STUPP BROS. BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY

No. 49659.

380 S.W.2d 382 (1964)

STATE of Missouri, on Information of Thomas F. EAGLETON, Attorney General, Relator, v. STUPP BROS. BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, Kansas City Structural Steel Company, St. Joseph Structural Steel Company, Missouri Valley Steel, Inc., A. J. Industries, Inc., and Havens Structural Steel Company, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

July 13, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. Eagleton, Atty. Gen., J. Gordon Siddens, Albert J. Stephan, Asst. Attys. Gen., Wm. Coleman Branton, James C. Wilson, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for relator.

R. H. McRoberts, E. C. Hartman, Stuart Symington, Jr., St. Louis, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, Joseph J. Kelly, Jr., Howard F. Sachs, Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, Kansas City, Robert A. Brown, Brown, Douglas & Brown, St. Joseph, Richmond C. Coburn, Coburn, Croft & Cook, St. Louis, Colvin A. Peterson, Jr., Landon H. Rowland, Kansas City, Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, Kansas City, for respondents other than A. J. Industries, Inc.

Coburn, Croft & Kohn, Richmond C. Coburn, Alan C. Kohn, St. Louis, for respondent Missouri Valley Steel, Inc.

Edward C. Freutel, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., John E. Park, John H. Kreamer, Kansas City, for respondent, A. J. Industries, Inc., O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., Gage, Hodges, Park & Kreamer, Kansas City, of counsel.

Robert L. Hyder, Jefferson City, Chief Counsel, amicus curiae, State Highway Commission.


HOLMAN, Judge.

This original proceeding in quo warranto was instituted on July 18, 1962, by the filing of an information charging respondent corporations with violation of the Missouri anti-trust statutes. See §§ 416.010 to 416.0401 inclusive. Respondents are Stupp Brothers Bridge & Iron Company, Kansas City Structural Steel Company, St. Joseph Structural Steel Company, Missouri Valley Steel, Inc., A. J. Industries, Inc....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases