1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 134 S.E.2d
  5. 134 S.E.2d 625 (1964)
 

HARRINGTON v. TUCKER

No. 95.

134 S.E.2d 625 (1964)

261 N.C. 372

Letha Belle HARRINGTON v. J. Brooks TUCKER.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 26, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. E. Cavendish, Greenville, for defendant appellant.

Albion Dunn, Greenville, for plaintiff appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant's assignments of error present no new question of law or point requiring extended discussion. A careful examination of the record and the assignments of error shows that the jury, under application of settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendant. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment are upheld.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases