The record clearly indicates that the frost was of brief duration, as the court found, and was of the type normally encountered and to be anticipated at that time of year and in that latitude on bridges crossing waterways. The State could not reasonably be required to warn of this natural though recurring condition on this bridge and perhaps on most bridges; nor, on the day of this accident, to have anticipated the fast-forming frost and been prepared to sand the bridge surface...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
