In testifying to a value of $12,000 per acre, claimant's expert gave effect to his conclusion that the highest and best use of the property was residential for "the front half" while "the rear would be industrial eventually". The property was in a Residential "B" zone, for one-acre building plots, and there is no adequate basis in the record for the witness' assumption of a rezoning to permit industrial use, and, indeed, claimant's application for such a change had been denied...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
