Per Curiam.
Petitioner contends that he was denied his constitutional rights because the court, in September 1962, would not allow him to change his plea to not guilty and would not grant him a continuance in order to obtain a new attorney. There is no record to substantiate either of these claims. However, even if true, such facts would not entitle petitioner to release by habeas corpus. The allowance of a change of plea is within the sound discretion of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
