FELCHER v. ARACE

No. 64-272.

164 So.2d 569 (1964)

Harry FELCHER and Sadie Felcher, Petitioners, v. Joseph A. ARACE and Joseph N. Arace, Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 2, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert E. Schrader, Jr., Coral Gables, for petitioners.

Samuel Sheradsky, Miami, for respondents.

Before CARROLL, HORTON and TILLMAN PEARSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on a petition under Rule 3.16, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., to review a cost order. As the losing parties in a law action the costs were adjudged against the defendants. They now challenge inclusion of the cost of a discovery deposition of the defendant Joseph A. Arace. The deposition was not taken in the present case. It was taken and filed in a prior case which had been terminated. The deposition represented a cost item in the case in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases