PROCTER & GAMBLE IND. U. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE MFG. CO.

No. 61-C-262.

229 F.Supp. 501 (1964)

PROCTER & GAMBLE INDEPENDENT UNION OF PORT IVORY, N. Y., Plaintiff, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE MFG. CO., Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 14, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garbarini, Scher, DeCicco & Berardino, New York City, for plaintiff; Sabino J. Berardino, New York City, and Martin Loftus, Newark, N. J., of counsel.

Battle, Fowler, Stokes & Kheel, New York City, Dinsmore, Shohl, Barrett, Coates & Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant; Samuel R. Pierce, New York City, Jack G. Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel.


RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a labor union, brings this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (Section 185 of Title 29 U.S.C.) to compel the defendant to arbitrate two disputes or grievances pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement dated June 23, 1960. The disputes involved Robert Spittel and Frank Wilson, employees of the defendant.

My colleague, Judge Bartels, granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases