Order affirmed.
Michael was in the custody of the respondent by virtue of an order of commitment issued by the County Court, Onondaga County. That court was duly vested with the jurisdiction to make such commitment order. The relator's claim of lack of knowledge of the criminal charge by reason of the fact that the indictment had been sealed is untenable. The record discloses that when a prior writ was sustained in the early part of 1957, Michael was remanded to the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
