1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 167 So.2d
  5. 167 So.2d 555 (1964)
 

ACME MOVING & STORAGE CO. OF JACKSONVILLE v. MASON

Nos. 33152-33157.

167 So.2d 555 (1964)

ACME MOVING & STORAGE CO. OF JACKSONVILLE et al., Petitioners, v. Edwin L. MASON et al., Respondents, and Harold J. Thompson, d/b/a Thompson's Movers, Intervener. ACME MOVING & STORAGE CO. OF JACKSONVILLE et al., Petitioners, v. Edwin L. MASON et al., Respondents, and Arlington Moving & Storage Company, Intervener. ACME MOVING & STORAGE CO. OF JACKSONVILLE et al., Petitioners, v. Edwin L. MASON et al., Respondents, and Lofton S. Merritt, d/b/a Merritt Moving & Storage Co., Intervener. ACME MOVING & STORAGE CO. OF JACKSONVILLE et al., Petitioners, v. Edwin L. MASON et al., Respondents, and George E. Paris and Lyllian L. Paris, d/b/a Beach Moving & Storage Co., Intervener. ACME MOVING & STORAGE CO. OF JACKSONVILLE, et al., Petitioners, v. Edwin L. MASON et al., Respondents, and Jacksonville Transfer & Storage, Inc., Intervener. ACME MOVING & STORAGE CO. OF JACKSONVILLE et al., Petitioners, v. Edwin L. MASON et al., Respondents, and Florida Moving & Storage of Jacksonville, Inc., Intervener.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied October 22, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Austin and O.C. Beakes, Jacksonville, for petitioners.

Lewis W. Petteway, Tallahassee, and John R. Alexander, Panama City, for Florida Public Utilities Commission.

Sack & Sack, Jacksonville, for Harold J. Thompson, d/b/a Thompson's Movers; Norman J. Bolinger and Schwartz, Proctor & Bolinger, Jacksonville, for Arlington Moving & Storage Co.; Clifford T. Inglis, Jacksonville, for Beach Moving & Storage Co., interveners.

O'CONNELL, Justice.

The above styled causes were consolidated for argument by order of this Court. The petitioners and respondents are identical in each case, however, there is a different intervener in each case. Nevertheless, the issues in each case are either identical, or so similar, as to permit decision of all cases by this one opinion.

The petitioners are long time holders of certificates of public convenience and necessity authorizing transportation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases