PILES v. STATE

[No. 184, September Term, 1963.]

233 Md. 487 (1964)

197 A.2d 238

PILES v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 6, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Brooks for the appellant.

Franklin Goldstein, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Arthur A. Marshall, Jr., State's Attorney for Prince George's County, and Richard E. Painter, Deputy State's Attorney, on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ.


PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County.

He complains (1) of the trial court's refusal to propound a question to the jury on voir dire; (2) a portion of the judge's advisory instructions; (3) that he was illegally arrested; (4) there was a "denial of due process of law"; (5) and he was not given the "benefit of doubt."

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases