Order, entered on January 15, 1963, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant and verdict directed in favor of appellant, with costs.
The motion made by appellant at the close of the evidence for a directed verdict in her favor should have been granted. Respondent submitted no proof from which the jury by any rational process could have based a finding in favor of respondent. Such verdict should have been granted because the court would have...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
