1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 237 Or.
  5. 237 Or. 477 (1964)
 

WELLS v. WELLS

237 Or. 477 (1964)

392 P.2d 246

WELLS v. WELLS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 13, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederic P. Roehr, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Harry F. Samuels and Vergeer & Samuels, Portland.

Wendell Gronso, Burns, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Cramer & Gronso, Burns, and Roy Kilpatrick, Canyon City.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

1, 2. This is an appeal by the defendant, former husband of the plaintiff, from an order of the circuit court which denied his motion to modify a decree which awarded to the plaintiff a divorce and the custody of the child of which the parties are the parents. The decree was entered May 27, 1960. The challenged order was entered April 8, 1963. The child was then ten years of age. The motion to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases