Per Curiam.
Respondent contends here that suspension from the practice of law for an indefinite period of time is too severe, and that he should be given a public reprimand. He did not testify at the hearing before the board and presents, for the first time before this court, claimed mitigating circumstances not urged before the board. He cites as authority the case of Dayton Bar Association v. Moore,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.