1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 226 F.Supp.
  5. 226 F.Supp. 477 (1964)
 

TINSLEY v. MAVALA, INC.

226 F.Supp. 477 (1964)

Frederic E. TINSLEY and Anstalt Dynos, Plaintiffs, v. MAVALA, INC. and C. Benjamin Dinerstein, individually and doing business under the name and style of C-B Sales Co., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Golenbock & Barell, New York City, for plaintiffs; Leonard Wagman, Henry C. Shays, New York City, of counsel.

Pross, Smith, Halpern & Lefevre, New York City, for defendants; Mitchell M. Bailey, New York City, of counsel.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The excessively voluminous affidavits — a compound of self-laudatory statements, recriminations and many irrelevancies — have served to obscure rather than to clarify the issues presented by this motion for multiple relief. Even so, out of the welter of conflict and charge and countercharge, certain facts do emerge. One is that Mavala, Inc., the defendant on whose behalf some measure of relief is derivatively sought, was formed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases