STATE v. GRISWOLD


151 Conn. 544 (1964)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ESTELLE T. GRISWOLD STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. C. LEE BUXTON

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 28, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine G. Roraback, for the appellants (defendants).

Julius Maretz, prosecuting attorney, and Joseph B. Clark, assistant prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).

KING, C. J., MURPHY, SHEA, ALCORN and COMLEY, JS.


COMLEY, J.

After a trial to the court in the Circuit Court for the sixth circuit at New Haven, the defendants were found guilty as accessories to certain violations of General Statutes § 53-32, which appears with the statute on accessories in the footnote.1 The principal offenders were not prosecuted. The convictions of the accessories were sustained by the Appellate Division of the Circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases