Order, entered October 23, 1963, dismissing indictment for lack of sufficient corroboration of testimony of accomplice unanimously modified on the law to the extent of reversing and reinstating the second and fourth counts of the indictment.
Much of the argument made by defendant on this appeal by the People is not relevant to the only point presented to this court, namely, whether there was sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice, Ezell. The fourth...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
