BOYD v. CROSBY LUMBER & MFG. CO.

No. 43053.

250 Miss. 433 (1964)

166 So.2d 106

BOYD v. CROSBY LUMBER & MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 1, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Netterville, Alonzo H. Sturgeon, Natchez, for appellant.

Watson & Wilkerson, Woodville; Cox, Dunn & Clark, Jackson, for appellee.


ETHRIDGE, J.

The question in this case is whether there was substantial evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom to support the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Commission that J.E. Durham, and thus Louis Fred Boyd, the appellant, was an employee of Crosby Lumber & Manufacturing Company (called Crosby), and not an independent contractor. We think there was. Reversing its attorney referee, the commission held...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases