1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 237 Or.
  5. 237 Or. 446 (1964)
 

CLARK v. AUTO WHOLESALE CO., INC.

237 Or. 446 (1964)

391 P.2d 754

CLARK v. AUTO WHOLESALE COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed with instructions April 29, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Moore, Hillsboro, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Brink and Moore, Hillsboro.

David W. Dardano, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Charles R. Mowry.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

REVERSED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

McALLISTER, C.J.

This is an action by plaintiff to recover compensatory and punitive damages on account of the conversion by the defendant of plaintiff's automobile. The jury awarded plaintiff both compensatory and punitive damages, and judgment was entered on the verdict. Thereafter the court entered an order eliminating the punitive damages from the judgment. From that order the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases