1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 24 Wis.2d
  5. 24 Wis.2d 650 (1964)
 

HIETPAS v. STATE

24 Wis.2d 650 (1964)

HIETPAS and wife, Appellants, v. STATE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

September 29, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Urban P. Van Susteren of Appleton.

For the respondent the cause was argued by A. J. Feifarek, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were George Thompson, attorney general, and A. W. Ponath, corporation counsel of Outagamie county.

BEILFUSS, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:

(1) Are benefits, if any, resulting to the Hietpas property by reason of the construction of the interchange general or special benefits?

(2) Was it prejudicial error to admit testimony of value for commercial use without showing a reasonable probability that zoning would be changed so as to permit that use?

(3) Was it prejudicial error to admit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases